ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-07-2022, 01:25 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 8,427
Thanks: 2,723
Thanked 3,807 Times in 2,270 Posts
Default

Nobody get your hopes up for Sean Payton. Zero chance of that happening.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brylok For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (11-07-2022)
  #22  
Old 11-07-2022, 01:25 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 8,427
Thanks: 2,723
Thanked 3,807 Times in 2,270 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lov2fish View Post
I think Fox is the interim coach since he has the most experience. Could be Bradley, but going with Fox
Yuck
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brylok For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (11-07-2022)
  #23  
Old 11-07-2022, 01:29 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,744
Thanks: 1,720
Thanked 1,885 Times in 1,062 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
The coach is usually the fall guy, but that offense was led by a QB who has no business playing in the NFL. I will say between Ballard and Reich, Reich is the one who is more likely to be upgraded in replacement. If they get rid of Ballard, there's potential for another Ryan Grigson or worse.
Reich needed to go, but make no mistake this shit show of a season is at least just as much if not more Ballard's fault. Ballard does have a good eye for talent though. Ideally it'd be good for him to stay on but become more flexible in his approach to the roster, or at least have learned from this dumpster fire and quit making rickolously unbelievable stupid decisions like placing Matt Pryor as our starting LT.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-07-2022, 01:40 PM
Thorgrim's Avatar
Thorgrim Thorgrim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Satellite of Love
Posts: 3,776
Thanks: 640
Thanked 1,629 Times in 879 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
Reich needed to go, but make no mistake this shit show of a season is at least just as much if not more Ballard's fault. Ballard does have a good eye for talent though. Ideally it'd be good for him to stay on but become more flexible in his approach to the roster, or at least have learned from this dumpster fire and quit making rickolously unbelievable stupid decisions like placing Matt Pryor as our starting LT.
Ballards leash just got much shorter. I hope they show his ass the door sooner rather than later
__________________
Chillin’ down at the CO2C
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Thorgrim For This Useful Post:
CanuckColt (11-07-2022)
  #25  
Old 11-07-2022, 01:41 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,258
Thanks: 345
Thanked 948 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
How does Vrable keep winning then? He's got no WR's. Trash at QB. Missing his top pass rusher. His #2 pass rusher is injured. Missing his LT.

The titans clearly do not have the talent of the Colts, but they just keep winning!
If you think the issues I listed are a recipe for success then I question your sanity. In a QB driven league changing QBs every year, not being able to pass block, not being able to rush the passer, or having WRs that can’t get open affects wins and losses. Having one of them MAY be manageable. Having more than one isn’t. Ballard has consistently let multiple be an issue. Remember when he started the season with no DE with double digit sacks (in a 4-3 alignment) TOTAL FOR THEIR CAREER? How many winning team do you think have done that in the modern NFL?

The Colts supposedly have a great LG, great off ball LB, and a great RB. Let’s for a second ignore the fact those are three of the least valuable positions in football, but how big a fucking impact have they had this year? Now tell me what Ballard has done at QB, LT, and DE - actual positions that affect winning. Having Tannehill over the last 5 years would be an improvement over what the team has done. Consistency at the position matters.

I’d take Vrabel as a coach, the question isn’t if he’s better than Reich, it’s if anyone could win consistently with the teams Ballard has put on the field. But regardless Reich was Ballard’s second choice at HC. Want to discuss how great his first choice is doing? If Franks sucks as bad as you think, it looks like Ballard has the same eye for HCs that he does QBs, LTs, and DEs.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (11-07-2022)
  #26  
Old 11-07-2022, 02:16 PM
HoosierinFL's Avatar
HoosierinFL HoosierinFL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,901
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,073 Times in 985 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
If you think the issues I listed are a recipe for success then I question your sanity. In a QB driven league changing QBs every year, not being able to pass block, not being able to rush the passer, or having WRs that can’t get open affects wins and losses. Having one of them MAY be manageable. Having more than one isn’t. Ballard has consistently let multiple be an issue. Remember when he started the season with no DE with double digit sacks (in a 4-3 alignment) TOTAL FOR THEIR CAREER? How many winning team do you think have done that in the modern NFL?

The Colts supposedly have a great LG, great off ball LB, and a great RB. Let’s for a second ignore the fact those are three of the least valuable positions in football, but how big a fucking impact have they had this year? Now tell me what Ballard has done at QB, LT, and DE - actual positions that affect winning. Having Tannehill over the last 5 years would be an improvement over what the team has done. Consistency at the position matters.

I’d take Vrabel as a coach, the question isn’t if he’s better than Reich, it’s if anyone could win consistently with the teams Ballard has put on the field. But regardless Reich was Ballard’s second choice at HC. Want to discuss how great his first choice is doing? If Franks sucks as bad as you think, it looks like Ballard has the same eye for HCs that he does QBs, LTs, and DEs.
Well I'd say we also have one of the best interior DT combos in the league with Grover and Buckner. Also I'd lobby for Kwity Paye being the best edge-setting run defending DEs in the league. The secondary is adquate. The pass rush clearly is a weakness, we need a double digit sack guy on this line.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-07-2022, 02:27 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,351
Thanks: 3,098
Thanked 3,326 Times in 1,763 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierinFL View Post
Well I'd say we also have one of the best interior DT combos in the league with Grover and Buckner. Also I'd lobby for Kwity Paye being the best edge-setting run defending DEs in the league. The secondary is adquate. The pass rush clearly is a weakness, we need a double digit sack guy on this line.
I can agree with all of that. But how big of a weakness is the pass rush really, when they haven't played from a lead all season?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-07-2022, 02:51 PM
WaynesWorld87 WaynesWorld87 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,595
Thanks: 89
Thanked 883 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Either Frank had no answers or Irsay wants to get a jump on somebody he had in mind.

Arians, Payton? Anybody know any other good HC candidates out there?
What about Ken Dorsey? I know it's going back down the "hot OC" route, but I'm sure his name is going to be plenty popular in HC searches by the off-season.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-07-2022, 06:15 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,484
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,130 Times in 1,209 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
If you think the issues I listed are a recipe for success then I question your sanity. In a QB driven league changing QBs every year, not being able to pass block, not being able to rush the passer, or having WRs that can’t get open affects wins and losses. Having one of them MAY be manageable. Having more than one isn’t. Ballard has consistently let multiple be an issue. Remember when he started the season with no DE with double digit sacks (in a 4-3 alignment) TOTAL FOR THEIR CAREER? How many winning team do you think have done that in the modern NFL?

The Colts supposedly have a great LG, great off ball LB, and a great RB. Let’s for a second ignore the fact those are three of the least valuable positions in football, but how big a fucking impact have they had this year? Now tell me what Ballard has done at QB, LT, and DE - actual positions that affect winning. Having Tannehill over the last 5 years would be an improvement over what the team has done. Consistency at the position matters.

I’d take Vrabel as a coach, the question isn’t if he’s better than Reich, it’s if anyone could win consistently with the teams Ballard has put on the field. But regardless Reich was Ballard’s second choice at HC. Want to discuss how great his first choice is doing? If Franks sucks as bad as you think, it looks like Ballard has the same eye for HCs that he does QBs, LTs, and DEs.
What QB has he had a chance at? Josh Allen, but that would've been mindnumbingly stupid at the time given that we had no idea Luck would do what he did. Who else has been available to sign, draft, trade for, etc.? The Texans would not have traded Watson here, and I wouldn't want to be on the other side of that contract if he pulled a Russell Wilson. Speaking of Wilson, he's another guy that could've been overpaid for and flopped. Could've also traded for Stafford, looks like that worked out for 1 season, his statline currently looks as bad as Matt Ryan's. Looking at the draft there hasn't been an opportunity to get a QB without trading up unless they were clairvoyant and drafted Josh Allen somehow knowing Luck would retire. We don't know Ballard's eye for QBs because he's been sifting through the trash heap ever since Luck's retirement. We know his eye for DEs isn't the best, as evidenced by the wasted draft capital at the position, but he hasn't had a chance at QB and he may have found a starting LT in Round 3 of the most recent draft.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-07-2022, 06:21 PM
CletusPyle CletusPyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 7,050
Thanked 4,145 Times in 2,411 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lov2fish View Post
We should have known it was coming when we saw this!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CletusPyle For This Useful Post:
Lov2fish (11-07-2022)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.