Glowinski Signed to Extension

[Dam8610]

Originally Posted by sherck

I really liked Glowinski's play for us in 2018 and am glad he is back for the next three seasons at a very attractive rate.

I will love to see what our "Fav Five" can do with a full offseason and Training Camp playing alongside each other. They could do rare things together.

Also, throw in Clark, Haeg, a mid/late round rookie and perhaps Boehm as quality depth and we are cooking on oil with the O-Line.

2020 = Castonzo UDFA (age 32)
2021 = Ryan Kelly UDFA (age 28)
2022 = Braden Smith UDFA (age 26), Mark Glowinski UDFA (age 30)
2023 = Quinton Nelson UDFA assuming we used 5th year option in 2022 (age 27)

Realisticly, our line could stay intact for 2020 / 2021 / 2022 but by then, Castonzo will probably need replaced and the team may not be able to re-sign both Smith and Glowinski in the same off season.

Enjoy the ride on O-Line Colts fans; it will hopefully be great for the next couple of years.

Walk Worthy

This is why getting the defense fixed this offseason is high priority. They're going to need to make investments in the OL again likely starting next year. Can't be stuck on needing a pass rusher at that point.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by JAFF

So if I suggest you work really hard at being a wanker, its ok because its accurrate

I don’t work hard at it at all. So it is not accurate

[sherck]

Originally Posted by FatDT

Not a big deal but the acronym UDFA usually stands for "undrafted free agent", does it not? Unrestricted free agent is usually UFA.

I have a feeling we could spend a higher pick than many expect on a center or center/guard prospect. Kelly is a top center when he is able to play, but he hasn't completed a single season without missing time with injury. He's the undisputed starter, but injuries like that pile up. If the right player comes along I could see Ballard using a 3rd on the future starting center.

Good catch! UFA is what I meant to type.

I agree. I think Clark has the possibility of being a starting OT on the Colts if he continues to progress. His progess from years 1 & 2 to last year (year 3) was impressive. New scheme, new coaches, new whatever had him play pretty solid in his spot duty.

But Haeg, whom I used to be super high on, appears to have a max cap of "good 6th man" and not of a starter. A young, quality depth guy for OC/OG would be welcome on the team.

OTs = Castonzo, Smith, Clark
OGs = Nelson, Glowinski, Rookie
OCs = Kelly, Rookie
5 Positional Quality Depth = Haeg
3 Positional Depth (OG/OC/OG) = Someone
(Note, the rookie depth at OG and OC is the same guy)


That is a great looking depth chart for 2019.

Walk Worthy,

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by sherck

I really liked Glowinski's play for us in 2018 and am glad he is back for the next three seasons at a very attractive rate.

I will love to see what our "Fav Five" can do with a full offseason and Training Camp playing alongside each other. They could do rare things together.

Also, throw in Clark, Haeg, a mid/late round rookie and perhaps Boehm as quality depth and we are cooking on oil with the O-Line.

2020 = Castonzo UDFA (age 32)
2021 = Ryan Kelly UDFA (age 28)
2022 = Braden Smith UDFA (age 26), Mark Glowinski UDFA (age 30)
2023 = Quinton Nelson UDFA assuming we used 5th year option in 2022 (age 27)

Realisticly, our line could stay intact for 2020 / 2021 / 2022 but by then, Castonzo will probably need replaced and the team may not be able to re-sign both Smith and Glowinski in the same off season.

Enjoy the ride on O-Line Colts fans; it will hopefully be great for the next couple of years.

Walk Worthy

Hypothetical question for you, well everyone really. Say one of the good tackles in the draft falls to our pick, maybe early second. Do you draft him? Anticipating castonzo’s contracy is up next year.

If you want a tackle, this is a good year to grab one.

And Ballard has said repeatedly he likes 10 guys on the roster for oline at all times.

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by omahacolt

I don’t work hard at it at all. So it is not accurate

Here's the problem. You are a wanker. And the worst kind. Like a diva. They are diva's but they don't think they are. You ARE A WANKER (polite way of saying DICK) and you don't think you are.

Being a human being isn't so bad. Try it, you might like it

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by FatDT

Not a big deal but the acronym UDFA usually stands for "undrafted free agent", does it not? Unrestricted free agent is usually UFA.

I have a feeling we could spend a higher pick than many expect on a center or center/guard prospect. Kelly is a top center when he is able to play, but he hasn't completed a single season without missing time with injury. He's the undisputed starter, but injuries like that pile up. If the right player comes along I could see Ballard using a 3rd on the future starting center.

What's wrong with Kelly?

[Dam8610]

Originally Posted by Chromeburn

Hypothetical question for you, well everyone really. Say one of the good tackles in the draft falls to our pick, maybe early second. Do you draft him? Anticipating castonzo’s contracy is up next year.

If you want a tackle, this is a good year to grab one.

And Ballard has said repeatedly he likes 10 guys on the roster for oline at all times.

I'd be more okay with that than wasting one of the top 60 picks on a WR or CB as I've seen in so many mock drafts.

Originally Posted by JAFF

What's wrong with Kelly?

He's injured too often.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by Chromeburn

Hypothetical question for you, well everyone really. Say one of the good tackles in the draft falls to our pick, maybe early second. Do you draft him? Anticipating castonzo’s contracy is up next year.

If you want a tackle, this is a good year to grab one.

And Ballard has said repeatedly he likes 10 guys on the roster for oline at all times.

If you think he has is a starting caliber tackle then I am good with it.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by JAFF

Here's the problem. You are a wanker. And the worst kind. Like a diva. They are diva's but they don't think they are. You ARE A WANKER (polite way of saying DICK) and you don't think you are.

Being a human being isn't so bad. Try it, you might like it

Nobody was even talking to you and you start calling me a wanker. That is exactly what a wanker would do. And who says wanker? Just say dick.

Feel free to make some good posts from time to time instead of trying to pick fights with me.

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by omahacolt

Nobody was even talking to you and you start calling me a wanker. That is exactly what a wanker would do. And who says wanker? Just say dick.

Feel free to make some good posts from time to time instead of trying to pick fights with me.

You are right. I'm so sorry. Never mind. I got crazy thinking you didn't know you just were being rude to someone. You know and you don't CARE.

You win.

PS It's a posting board, so EVERYONE saw it. I didn't think I was suppose to think it was private. Damn the internet, I just don't get it.