ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2018, 01:19 PM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,960
Thanks: 2,657
Thanked 1,586 Times in 691 Posts
Default

Just saw this analysis:
Quote:
Just broke down Andrew Luck vs Oakland. He was knocked down 1 time. He was completely untouched on 24 of 31 pass attempts. The pass protection was incredible. Finally, he has a legit OL.
FINALLY, a legit O-Line!

Man, I have been wanting that since we drafted Andrew!

Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (10-30-2018)
  #2  
Old 10-30-2018, 01:38 PM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

So far this year :

10 sacks on about 340 pass attempts

Once every 34 attempts.

I didn't look specifically, but it may be the lowest rate in the league for a starting QB. Its at least among the lowest. Of the starters the lowest number of sacks for the year is 8 or 9 and he is passing more than them, more attempts

I did not look up prior years, but I am guessing that is much improved, since it seemed like before he was getting hit or pressure about every other attempt
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2018, 03:47 PM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 858
Thanks: 336
Thanked 666 Times in 285 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
So far this year :

10 sacks on about 340 pass attempts

Once every 34 attempts.

I didn't look specifically, but it may be the lowest rate in the league for a starting QB. Its at least among the lowest. Of the starters the lowest number of sacks for the year is 8 or 9 and he is passing more than them, more attempts

I did not look up prior years, but I am guessing that is much improved, since it seemed like before he was getting hit or pressure about every other attempt
You are correct - our sack rate is lowest in the league (2.92%).
Second lowest is Pittsburg at 3.37% (10 sacks in 297 attempts)
For context, League average is 7.02%
Worst is San Fran at a whopping 12.02% (31 sacks in 258 attempts). When do we get to play them?

Last year, the Colts sack rate was - are you ready for this - 11.5% (56 sacks in 487 attempts). Crazy.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/t...assingAttempts
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Chaka For This Useful Post:
1965southpaw (10-30-2018), DrSpaceman (10-30-2018), Racehorse (10-30-2018), sherck (10-31-2018), VeveJones007 (10-30-2018)
  #4  
Old 10-30-2018, 04:13 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
You are correct - our sack rate is lowest in the league (2.92%).
Second lowest is Pittsburg at 3.37% (10 sacks in 297 attempts)
For context, League average is 7.02%
Worst is San Fran at a whopping 12.02% (31 sacks in 258 attempts). When do we get to play them?

Last year, the Colts sack rate was - are you ready for this - 11.5% (56 sacks in 487 attempts). Crazy.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/t...assingAttempts
That's absurd. Imagine if we see a similar type of improvement on defense next year.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
Chaka (10-30-2018), Racehorse (10-30-2018), sherck (10-31-2018)
  #5  
Old 10-30-2018, 04:22 PM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 858
Thanks: 336
Thanked 666 Times in 285 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
That's absurd. Imagine if we see a similar type of improvement on defense next year.
We have literally moved from worst to first on sack rate. It is pretty shocking.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-30-2018, 06:14 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,207
Thanks: 22,243
Thanked 5,788 Times in 3,288 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
That's absurd. Imagine if we see a similar type of improvement on defense next year.
One can hope
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-30-2018, 05:29 PM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
You are correct - our sack rate is lowest in the league (2.92%).
Second lowest is Pittsburg at 3.37% (10 sacks in 297 attempts)
For context, League average is 7.02%
Worst is San Fran at a whopping 12.02% (31 sacks in 258 attempts). When do we get to play them?

Last year, the Colts sack rate was - are you ready for this - 11.5% (56 sacks in 487 attempts). Crazy.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/t...assingAttempts

What is surprising about that stat from last year is that it was ONLY 11.5%. I would have guessed higher.

The rate it is at now, through this half season, is about where it was when manning was at his peak. He would take about 20-25 sacks a year, 1-2 a game.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-30-2018, 05:43 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,334
Thanks: 9,612
Thanked 5,652 Times in 3,081 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
You are correct - our sack rate is lowest in the league (2.92%).
Second lowest is Pittsburg at 3.37% (10 sacks in 297 attempts)
For context, League average is 7.02%
Worst is San Fran at a whopping 12.02% (31 sacks in 258 attempts). When do we get to play them?

Last year, the Colts sack rate was - are you ready for this - 11.5% (56 sacks in 487 attempts). Crazy.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/t...assingAttempts
While some thought drafting Nelson was too high for a guard, this shows that he was well worth the pick. Kelly and Nelson were damn good picks in the 1st round. Finally have a running game to help Luck and it is great not seeing Luck getting the shit kicked out of him every game.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (10-30-2018), YDFL Commish (10-30-2018)
  #9  
Old 10-30-2018, 01:54 PM
1965southpaw's Avatar
1965southpaw 1965southpaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,010
Thanks: 559
Thanked 844 Times in 401 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
Just saw this analysis:


FINALLY, a legit O-Line!

Man, I have been wanting that since we drafted Andrew!

Walk Worthy,
I heard Big Joe say today that our oline coach told him this week that he thinks Ryan Kelly is the best center in the NFL.....I don't get the sense that this coach is one who tends to say positive things just because.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-30-2018, 02:25 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,517
Thanks: 1,474
Thanked 3,876 Times in 2,165 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1965southpaw View Post
I heard Big Joe say today that our oline coach told him this week that he thinks Ryan Kelly is the best center in the NFL.....I don't get the sense that this coach is one who tends to say positive things just because.....
That is some high praise. He does seem to have turned it up a notch this year. Hopefully these guys will get some pro bowl nods if they keep it up. From one of the worst olives to one of the best in about a year. Not too shabby.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (10-30-2018)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.