![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
If he truly wants power over personnel decisions, the answer is, and I am sure Ballard will tell him, no
I don't hate the idea of McDaniels. At least the offense would be good. Just wouldn't be my first choice. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Short of that, I'd go McDaniels. As you said, the offense would be good and there's a high correlation rate right now between QB development (and in turn team success) and HC's that are offensive-minded: Sean McVay comes to the Rams and they're suddenly one of the best teams in football and Jared Goff has a meteoric development, Doug Pederson has the Eagles thriving until Wentz died, Jason Garrett/Dak Prescott, Jay Gruden/Kirk Cousins, Kyle Shanahan/Jimmy Garappolo, Doug Marrone/Bortles, and Adam Gase had gotten Ryan Tannehill to being a postseason QB before he died. Gimme an offensive-minded HC. Last edited by Coltsalr; 01-04-2018 at 09:41 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Just the same as the offensive minded head coach must make a good decision on the defensive coordinator or you're screwed on that side of the ball. It's the same either way, they just have to make smart hires |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, he appears to have learned a lot from his mistakes. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
How do you know if he learned anything or not?
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Maniac For This Useful Post: | ||
smitty46953 (01-05-2018) | ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
if he is looking for GM level control of the roster, then he clearly didnt learn from one of his major mistakes.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is that why he's said to want GM level input? Because he learned from the last time he had GM level input that that was a bad idea?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|