Kyle Pitts instead of Michael Pittman?

[albany ed]

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc

I’m not saying that will happen, I’m just saying it’s not out of the realm of possibility. I know they think quite a bit of Pittman.

If they decide Pierce is too expensive, then Pittman will most likely be back on his current deal, because in that scenario he’d have no reason to take less and the Colts would need him to much to force the issue.

Is there anything that precludes the Colts from renegotiating Pittmans contract now? That's what I would do, and if he stands fast, he isn't that hot on the idea of remaining with the Colts.