|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who do you think will be the QB for 2022 | |||
| Wentz |
   
|
10 | 27.03% |
| Ehlinger |
  
|
3 | 8.11% |
| Draft. Who and what round |
  
|
2 | 5.41% |
| Wilson What are you trading |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Rogers What are you trading |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Watson What are you trading |
  
|
1 | 2.70% |
| Tribusky |
|
8 | 21.62% |
| Bridgewater |
|
1 | 2.70% |
| Jimmy G What are you trading |
|
3 | 8.11% |
| Other |
|
9 | 24.32% |
| Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
03-09-2022, 11:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Still hoping for Jimmy G
An interesting side note Desmond Ridders high school coach was Will Wolford 
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to apballin For This Useful Post: | ||
nate505 (03-09-2022) | ||
|
#3
03-09-2022, 06:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm very curious what the move is now. Wentz off the books gives us $70m to work with. Now some of these lateral moves are a lot more palatable.
Rodgers and Wilson are set and I don't see McDaniels bailing on Carr. So Watson seems to be the only upgrade available. I live north of Houston, so I get plenty of Texans exposure and local perspective concerning Watson... A.) Who knows what his legal status will be. Grand jury on Friday. B.) He's an upgrade over Wentz because he's more elusive/athletic than Wentz and a bit more accurate. C.) A lot of the same shit we didn't like about Wentz is present with Watson. Holding the ball, not processing and being decisive, give you a heart attack multiple times a game trying to extend plays, etc. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it hurts. Better than Wentz, but similar type of things. D.) Character stuff gets brought up. Nothing crazy, but stuff like eyes-on-me first down gestures when you're down 21-0 in the second half of a playoff game against the Colts (that was a big one here). E.) He hasn't played since 2020 and he'll be expensive. We have all the cap room we need, but it'll still cost picks and players. That's a lot to consider. Otherwise, what? A lateral move for less money would allow you to go after guys like Armstead and whoever else. Is there even enough out there to go after that would make a lateral QB move produce a better team than last year? Is the pie-in-the-sky best scenario now that Ehlinger can play football as well as these guys and none of that $70m has to be spent on QB?
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ChaosTheory For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (03-09-2022) | ||
|
#4
03-09-2022, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
03-09-2022, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i don't think he is worth what they will want for him
|
|
#7
03-09-2022, 08:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
03-09-2022, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We can basically send the Washington picks to them and it’s an even swap
|
|
#9
03-11-2022, 10:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
So apparently they are targeting Carr? I didn't see but I guess McAfee said that on his show yesterday.
I've read some Raiders fans sweating bullets over trading Carr. Bringing up how McDaniels went to Denver and immediately traded Cutler. From LV's perspective... there's two ways to speculate I suppose... Either they have to have Carr because the division is loaded at QB and no bad teams. Or McDaniels is thinking longer term, takes a haul for Carr, and builds from there. Wishful thinking on my part, I'm sure. Last edited by ChaosTheory; 03-11-2022 at 10:41 AM.
|
|
#10
03-11-2022, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I mean if it’s a 3rd for Jimmy vs a Twos 2nd for Carr I’d still roll with Jimmy
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
