![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not even from Indiana so as usual your bashing is a swing and a miss. And you absolutely do bench a player to help your position unless you're a total fucking moron.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
and no you fucking don't bench the player just for the draft pick. this may be a surprise to you, but a lot of people aren't pieces of shit. you make a deal, you honor the deal. it really shouldn't even be a discussion in the front office and i'm sure it isn't |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post: | ||
Brylok (10-11-2021), TheMugwump (10-13-2021) | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
How exactly isn't that honoring the deal? The deal doesn't state that Wentz had to be healthy. I imagine it is being discussed in the front office as a potential move because I imagine the front office isn't that dumb. Last edited by nate505; 10-10-2021 at 09:28 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Ballard made the decision to give up a first round pick. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post: | ||
CletusPyle (10-11-2021) | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If Philly didn’t want to risk not getting the 1st rounder, they shouldn’t have made the deal. There’s nothing unethical about it. Do you expect players to fulfill the contract they signed no matter what? How is that different? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So let's say by the 14th game Wentz needs to sit out the next four to get the Colts under that 75% mark, and the Colts have a horrible record like 3-10 or something and are well out of the playoff race. What exactly is the benefit of playing him? At that point the negatives are plenty. Wentz could hurt himself the next four games in games that are meaningless for the Colts and the Colts would lose a potential top 5 or whatever pick all because...they want to follow some unwritten rules of a deal? Imagine the shitstorm that would follow if Wentz played in this scenario to the point where the Colts lost their first round pick, then he has like an ACL tear or some real significant injury. At that point the Colts wouldn't even have a high pick to fall back on. If the deal was that Wentz was expected to play for anything other than injuries, they could have mandated that healthy scratches don't count for the snap count in the deal. Then if the Colts claimed he had a sore ankle or whatever to get him on the injury report one could make the claim the Colts were being unethical. In this case, the deal is pretty simple. He either plays 70/75% of his snaps or he doesn't. If Ballard really wanted to trade a first round pick for the guy, he would have. These conditions are here for a reason. Either for injury, he sucks so bad that they'd rather play the backup, or the Colts suck so bad with him that they don't want to give up a first round pick. Last edited by nate505; 10-11-2021 at 04:04 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to nate505 For This Useful Post: | ||
Hoopsdoc (10-11-2021) | ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I mean sure, if you don't know the definition of the word. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If Philly wanted a 1st round pick, they should have held out for a first round pick with no strings attached. If a situation arises where the Colts are clearly out of contention and Wentz is still playing hurt, they’d be fools NOT to bench him. They’d be hurting themselves for no reason. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i say shitty and explain it pretty clearly. if you lack morals, integrity and ethics then you are a shitty person. do you not understand integrity? nate doesn't. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|