What’s more bizarre?...

[Colts And Orioles]

Originally Posted by Brylok

Oh, I agree. The Colts are boring as hell now. I'm just saying they aren't awful...like 3-13 style awful. They're also irrelevant now. Outside of Colts fans, most people don't watch them, so they don't know. The national media has made Jacoby into something he's not. We know that, but they don't because they don't watch. There's no way he should be near the Pro Bowl at any level. I'd say Josh Allen in Buffalo is far more deserving. But the Brissett narrative is out there, so people just believe it. It's awful to watch right now tho.

Watch out for C&O. He'll be along to tell you the 1984-1998 Colts weren't awful either. Matter of opinion, I guess.

o


I never said that the 1984-1998 Colts were not awful.

I said that the Colts were the laughingstock in 1984, 1985, 1986, 1991, and 1993, and below average in 1990.

I specifically said that the Colts were not awful/shit in 1987, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1994, 1995, and 1996 in my posts that you are alluding to ........ there is nothing to watch out for.

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles

o


The Colts had 6 losing seasons in that period between 1984 and 1996.

The Colts were the laughingstock from 1984 through 1986, when they won a total of 12 games (and lost 36.) The Eric Dickerson trade during the 1987 season trade changed that, and it showed in their record. I don't see going 9-6 with a division title, 9-7, and 8-8 as "shit."

I suppose that we have different definitions of "shit." For me, there was a significant difference between the 1984-1986 teams (that went a combined 12-36), the 1991 and 1993 teams (that went a combined 5-27), and the other teams between 1984 and 1996 that went .500 or better (except for the 7-9 1990 team.)


o

http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/show...106#post145106


o