Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc
If it was a fumble by Levis, then it doesn’t matter if he had his hands under it because it’s a fumble recovery, not an interception.
But it wasn’t a fumble by Levis.
|
o
I don't know exactly what you are arguing ...... whether it was ruled a fumble or an INT, the ball would have been marked right at the spot that they marked it.
If it was a fumble by Levis, we fumbled it right back to them ...... and if it was a pass by Levis, then it would have been ruled an INT (he clearly had his hands under the ball before it hit the ground), and we still fumbled the ball right back to them.
o