Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm
No doubt. I'd hate to see how he reacts to something that actually matters not going his way since he can't even admit when he's wrong about meaningless armchair GMing.
|
What exactly would I have to "admit I'm wrong about" regarding which QBs from the 2023 draft will be successful?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lov2fish
No, you are the narcissist. Everything revolves around you being right. God forbid you're wrong, psst, you are, a lot!
|
Psst, anyone who has opinions on these things is wrong a lot. Elite GMs are right about 50% of the time. I'm not going to argue that I'm wrong, though, that's counterproductive. I wouldn't expect anyone to do that. The whole point of a message board is the discussion. That's what makes it interesting. Everyone sitting around agreeing would be pretty boring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc
I don’t disagree but using that as proof that he can’t make it in the NFL and that he has accuracy issues is just not accurate. It’s why I brought up Mahomes, who played in a similar offense and who is the best in the league now.
The nfl is moving more and more toward that style of offense. It stands to reason that more and more of these guys will succeed in the league going forward.
At the end of the day, none of us know. Not even Dam. Saying drafting Hooker is a wasted pick is silly, especially coming from someone who has been wrong as often as Dam.
|
Why is it silly? I believe that. Of course I could be wrong, anyone can be. Pretty much everyone was wrong about Brock Purdy. I wish I'd said more about him, because he always stood out to me when watching Breece Hall, one of the many reasons I go with the consensus less and less as time goes on. But Brock Purdy is the exception. For every one of those there are 20 of Bailey Zappe, Anthony Gordon, Graham Harrell et al.
And when it comes to Air Raid QBs, Mahomes is 1000% the exception. Air Raid QBs outside of him have done nothing in the NFL.