Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc
I can actually see the logic in it from a pure money ball perspective. They needed space to resign Kittle, Warner, etc and were up against the cap. Buckner wanted at least 20 million per. Armstead was a little cheaper and they talked themselves into the notion that they could make up that difference with their stacked d line.
What they didn’t calculate was the type of player Defo is. You don’t replace incredibly durable, all pro, defensive captains like him, especially when he’s only 25.
The fact that a guy like Ballard jumped on that deal should have clued them in that it was a bad one.
|
Armstead is two years older too. Kim law looks like he is going to be pretty good though. But like most dline, might take a couple years.
I’m thinking scenarios. They were losing one of them. I wonder if they offered Armstead and we said no. So the 49ers thought we can keep Buckner, or we can keep Armstead and the 13 pick.