![]() |
Quote:
Nelson and Hernandez on the same offensive line....brutal for opponents |
Quote:
I like Jones as well. |
My feelings on OG at 6 aside, I think Day 2 can be one helluva shopping spree for Ballard.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Man those extras picks from Buffalo would be very nice right about now. Out of those guys I would love Josh Jackson, Maurice Hurst, and Guice. Secondary picks would be Landry, Green, and Ronald Jones or Connor Williams. |
Quote:
Maybe more realistically, Ballard thinks he can get an OT with potential at #49--O'Neill, Rankin, Crosby, someone like that. And he uses #36 and #37 for RB and defense (in either order) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is a sickness |
Quote:
|
Assuming the Colts doctors sign off, it would be pretty amazing to come out of today with something like:
36) Landry 37) Jefferson 49) Oliver 67) Hurst But I still expect Ballard to take Sutton at 36 or 37. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nelson Landry Jefferson Oliver Hurst |
A couple of random thoughts from Day 1:
1) Take note that Ballard has succeeded in absolutely locking down any leaks to the media. Prior to the draft, there were no hints that Nelson was going to be picked. All of the "insider" information being circulated in the media suggested the pick would be Smith if Chubb wasn't available. Just keep this in mind the next time you hear a Colt-related rumor purporting to be from an anonymous insider. 2) The Jets justified their trade with the Colts. Sounded like highway robbery at first, but as it turned out it looks like the Jets did pretty well for themselves. Still a great deal for the Colts, of course. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, I'm still pissed Pagano won in Week 17. I think Ballard squeezes NYJ for next year's 1st instead of 2nd if the Jets were moving up to #2 pre-draft. |
Quote:
1) First, to be fair, its not like he didn't try to address the guard situation in free agency. That was the one position where he made the most concentrated (though unsuccessful) effort to address in free agency (in retrospect, perhaps that should have been a hint to us that Nelson might be the pick). I think he made an effort to sign all of the top available guards, but he was outbid. You can certainly say he should have paid more, but I'm sure we can both agree that there is a limit after which even you wouldn't pay what the free agent guard was asking for. The guards went beyond Ballard's threshold, and he signed Slauson instead - who I'm hopeful will be a serviceable solution for a year or two. 2) If we are to believe what we read, Nelson's skills likely exceed those of the free agent guards that were available. 3) Maybe he wasn't as enthralled with the two LB prospects you are referring to (Smith and Edmunds, presumably) as everyone seems to think. I know that popular speculation had the Colts considering these guys, but I'm not sure how reliable any of this is because its pretty clear that Ballard has really locked down the leaks from the front office. I don't recall reading any reports of sources suggesting that the Colts were seriously interested or planning to take Nelson prior to the draft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
think after choosing Nelson at #6 Ballard really needs to get at least one impact defensive player in Round 2--if Landry's gone, maybe a CB or LB or maybe some team's QB-desperate enough for someone like Rudolph to make a trade offer--but off the top of my head, the only other teams w/ multiple 2nd rounders are Cleveland and Buffalo, and they (presumably) already have their QBs |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.