ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   2017 Draft Thread (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1397)

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 10288)
The way I kind of picture him is inside for two downs and outside for passing downs. But he would give you the option of blitzing him from virtually anywhere. But him out there with a dedicated EDGE and then you really start causing problems. Will he cover the TE or RB and do it very well? Or is he coming on a blitz? But as a dedicated EDGE, I don't know. He has great bend, but he will have problems with long armed tackles, he is just so short for that position. I would rather combine him with a Harris, Rivers, Watt, or Bowser. That could be a deadly combo.

Also, Foster is an excellent blitzer from between the tackles.

I do think Reddick is smart and has great character and that will play a role. Ballard is reading about the Cubs build by Epstein and this quote seemed to have an impact on Ballard.

"Theo -- baseball was getting flat in terms of the analytics and the edge that they were getting from the numbers -- so he kind of took a different approach with character," Ballard said, via ESPN's Mike Wells. "We want high-character guys that love football, that will hold each other accountable, that will be good teammates. It stuck out like a beacon light.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...n-cubs-example

I would be very happy with either Foster or Reddick at 15. Otherwise, I definitely want them to move down.

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coltsalr (Post 10268)
As a Florida guy, do you have any take on Jarrad Davis? He also strikes me as a guy that would be a safe 1st round pick, albeit that he might be a bit of a reach at #15 (though perhaps maybe not, as there's some recent rumblings that he could go ahead of Reuben Foster in the top 15).

My take, Davis is talented and can play in just about any system. If you ignore his injuries he should be a very good player. I think he would be best suited for a 4-3 Mike or Sam role. He is best attacking in a one gap system rather than a sit and read 3-4. You want to point him in a direction and let him go. I think he would thrive in that role, but he is talented and athletic enough to play in any system.

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherck (Post 10303)
Trade from 1-15 to 1-19 and then from 1-19 to about 1-24 or 1-25 nets you 2 3rd round choices with trading nothing away.

Cheers,

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Somewhat reasonable scenario off the top of my head:

Broncos move up from 1.20 for McCaffrey or OL, then Texans move up from 1.25 for a QB.

Net result = 2 extra 3rds and a similar player at 1.25 that they could have had at 1.15

Spike 04-21-2017 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 10284)
Ok, we have all talked about our desire to trade down and pick up additional picks. Which I'm all for BTW!

But how many would be in favor of trading up to get the once in a lifetime talent of Myles Garrett?

What would it take to do so? At least this years 1st and next years 1st at a minimum, I would expect. But how much more?

How many would be in favor of such a move?

Nope! Done trading with the fucking Browns. Plus, way too many holes to fill. If we were an edge rusher away from the SB, then sure, but we are far from being in that position. Need DB's, linebackers, Oline, running backs, and a competent head coach.

Spike 04-21-2017 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10311)
Somewhat reasonable scenario off the top of my head:

Broncos move up from 1.20 for McCaffrey or OL, then Texans move up from 1.25 for a QB.

Net result = 2 extra 3rds and a similar player at 1.25 that they could have had at 1.15

The only problem with the Texans moving up from 25 to 20 is that the 4 teams in front of them don't need a QB. Lions, Dolphins, Raiders, Giants.

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spike (Post 10320)
The only problem with the Texans moving up from 25 to 20 is that the 4 teams in front of them don't need a QB. Lions, Dolphins, Raiders, Giants.

Yeah, but they have to worry about QB-needy teams behind them leapfrogging them, such as SF, CHI, NYJ, KC. They were one pick away from Bridgewater falling to them a couple years back until the Vikings moved up.

Spike 04-21-2017 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10326)
Yeah, but they have to worry about QB-needy teams behind them leapfrogging them, such as SF, CHI, NYJ, KC. They were one pick away from Bridgewater falling to them a couple years back until the Vikings moved up.

Great point!

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 03:39 PM

Matt Miller‏ @nfldraftscout 16m16 minutes ago

Latest buzz:

- Foster falls to "Myles Jack" range
- Ross, Mixon, Cook Rd2
- 2 QBs going top 10 (Trubisky, Mahomes?)

YDFL Commish 04-21-2017 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10336)
Matt Miller‏ @nfldraftscout 16m16 minutes ago

Latest buzz:

- Foster falls to "Myles Jack" range
- Ross, Mixon, Cook Rd2
- 2 QBs going top 10 (Trubisky, Mahomes?)

I can definitely see that scenario playing out.

Butter 04-21-2017 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 10352)
I can definitely see that scenario playing out.

QBs will always move up the board.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.