ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   quick thoughts on the fucking bullshit raiders game (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83731)

Maniac 09-30-2019 12:24 PM
Burfict suspended for the rest of the season. Good. Fucking dirty bastard deserves it.

Chromeburn 09-30-2019 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac (Post 134687)
Burfict suspended for the rest of the season. Good. Fucking dirty bastard deserves it.
That hit was inexcusable, especially considering all the work the officials and league have done trying to get him to clean up his game. My guess is he just can’t control his emotions on the field.

Chromeburn 09-30-2019 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck4Reich (Post 134621)
Yet Al Woods is off to a great start playing very well for the Seahawks who are the #4 rushing Defense in the NFL. Nope Colts couldnt use a guy like that.
Who run a very similar defense

VeveJones007 09-30-2019 02:45 PM
One thing I noticed on occasion when reviewing the All 22 the last two games: the LBs and DBs were often spending too much time reading the QB and not enough time watching for receivers entering/leaving their zone. The result was what seemed to be "soft" coverage and players not getting the proper depth. I'll be keying in on that during my review of the All 22 this week.

omahacolt 09-30-2019 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 134710)
One thing I noticed on occasion when reviewing the All 22 the last two games: the LBs and DBs were often spending too much time reading the QB and not enough time watching for receivers entering/leaving their zone. The result was what seemed to be "soft" coverage and players not getting the proper depth. I'll be keying in on that during my review of the All 22 this week.
You don’t really need all 22 to see the lbers dont pay much mind to people around their zones

VeveJones007 09-30-2019 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 134712)
You don’t really need all 22 to see the lbers dont pay much mind to people around their zones
In some cases, you're right. In others, there's a levels concept that you can't see without the All 22.

ChoppedWood 09-30-2019 04:44 PM
MF'er- Venturi just said that from halftime of the Falcon's game until 1 minute gone in the 2nd Qtr yest- Ryan and Carr completed 30 of 31 fucking attempts!

That's garbage, that's ass, that's a fucking joke.

YDFL Commish 09-30-2019 05:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 134710)
One thing I noticed on occasion when reviewing the All 22 the last two games: the LBs and DBs were often spending too much time reading the QB and not enough time watching for receivers entering/leaving their zone. The result was what seemed to be "soft" coverage and players not getting the proper depth. I'll be keying in on that during my review of the All 22 this week.
I've noticed that as well.

AlwaysSunnyinIndy 09-30-2019 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike (Post 134537)
Really thought FR should have attempted on onside kick at the end considering how bad the defense was playing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic (Post 134608)
Success rate of onside kicks is now practically zero since there's no running start and no unbalanced lineup for the kick


Reich was asked this question - Why no onside kick? - during his conference call with the media. He stated that since the rule change, the kicking team hardly recovers the ball - only a 7 percent recovery rate.


https://twitter.com/JoelAErickson/st...65349329735681

Quote:
Reich says the numbers on onside kicks are 7 percent recoveries for kicking team since the new rule.

VeveJones007 09-30-2019 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy (Post 134753)
Reich was asked this question - Why no onside kick? - during his conference call with the media. He stated that since the rule change, the kicking team hardly recovers the ball - only a 7 percent recovery rate.


https://twitter.com/JoelAErickson/st...65349329735681
I was fine with the decision. Sanchez needs a better kick, though. You pin them down around the 10, get a stop, and hopefully get the ball around the 50 with just under a minute left. I think that’s more likely than 7%.

Maniac 09-30-2019 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy (Post 134753)
Reich was asked this question - Why no onside kick? - during his conference call with the media. He stated that since the rule change, the kicking team hardly recovers the ball - only a 7 percent recovery rate.


https://twitter.com/JoelAErickson/st...65349329735681
7 percent chance to recover the onside kick vs virtually 0 percent chance that this trash defense gets a stop. Go with the onside kick.

Spike 10-01-2019 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy (Post 134753)
Reich was asked this question - Why no onside kick? - during his conference call with the media. He stated that since the rule change, the kicking team hardly recovers the ball - only a 7 percent recovery rate.


https://twitter.com/JoelAErickson/st...65349329735681
Yeah, well the way the defense was playing, I'll take that 7 percent chance.

Pez 10-01-2019 08:51 AM
The onside kick vs no onside kick was immaterial to this game. OK's were only about a 15% chance before the rule change, half that since.

There's likely about a 7% chance that Derek Carr will fumble the hand off and Houston will fall on it.

ChileColts 10-01-2019 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc (Post 134550)
On number 17-where would you have liked for Ballard to spend money? I’m assuming you’re talking about defensive help. Who was out there that would have helped? I honestly don’t know.

As I said in the game thread, the defense is just soft. And teams have noticed it.

Definitely Reich’s worst game so far. No one was ready to play, except Brissett, who I actually thought played decently given the complete lack of help he got, and Hines. Then I thought, surely they’ll come out hot in the 2nd half-nope, same shit. Very discouraging.

I fully expect a better showing next Sunday night, although they’ll still lose.
Gerald McCoy and Ndk. Suh looked like better options than Grover Stewart and Margus Hunt.

Colts And Orioles 10-06-2019 04:15 PM
o


The Raiders just claimed another upset win, this time over the Bears.

They're 3-2 overall.


o

Chromeburn 10-06-2019 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 135500)
o


The Raiders just claimed another upset win, this time over the Bears.

They're 3-2 overall.


o
Maybe the Raiders aren’t so bad this year.

Colt Classic 10-06-2019 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 135539)
Maybe the Raiders aren’t so bad this year.
Chase Daniel sucks ass. The Bears game plan was swing passes to Tarik Cohen all day. Now that I think about it, that's their game plan every week. Maybe find Trey Burton once in a while.

Chromeburn 10-06-2019 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic (Post 135582)
Chase Daniel sucks ass. The Bears game plan was swing passes to Tarik Cohen all day. Now that I think about it, that's their game plan every week. Maybe find Trey Burton once in a while.
Forgot whats his name was hurt.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.