![]() |
Probably too old, too expensive (picks + contract), and too much of an individual for Ballard.
|
No thanks. Pass.
|
Quote:
|
Only reason I'm intrigued is that he is basically a better WR than Chester Rogers. I think an offense where one of Bell/Hines is on the field at all times is a much better offense than what Colts have now.
|
Quote:
|
Not interested at all
|
Quote:
|
I would have been more in favor of the Mack trade. I think defensive players transition to new teams better than offensive players.
Bell is approaching 30 and he wants unprecedented money. Not as a RB but as a RB and WR combined. You pay that it takes away from other positions. |
Quote:
|
It would be a tactical and not strategic move. He would be a near term distraction that would be outside the overall vision for this team.
Add to that how it would change the game plan. He was so successful in Pittsburgh because they had 5 years to work his talent into their game plan. FFS, he caught 85 passes last year. He's only 26, but has missed time in 4 of his 5 seasons. Grigson would have already inked the deal. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.