ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   2017 Draft Thread (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1397)

Coltsalr 04-20-2017 04:45 PM

I'm hoping that that takes him off teams 1-14 boards and not ours.

Let's see if Ballard is willing to take a risk on this stuff. As others have mentioned, he's been in the front office when the Chiefs have taken bad boys.

There was also this tweet today:

Stephen Holder‏ @HolderStephen 2h2 hours ago
Going back thru Ballard's presser from yesterday. I'm struck by him saying that no players are off the Colts' board yet. “No, at this point"

I'm assuming he was aware of Foster's urine sample 2 hours ago (probably closer to 2 months ago).

HoosierinFL 04-20-2017 06:51 PM

So according to Foster, the diluted urine was the result of him dealing with a stomach bug and trying to flush his system by drinking a lot of water and gatorade.
OK, so that *might* be true, in which case, he falls to 15 and we get a great ILB.
or, it *might* be an elaborate lie, in which case who knows how it will turn out. He might still end up a great player anyway.

natagu23 04-20-2017 07:01 PM

Goddamit.

Welp....

apballin 04-20-2017 09:16 PM

No fuckin way fournette falls to us

Puck 04-20-2017 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coltsalr (Post 10101)
Ignoring both LB and CB for the first two rounds would cause both Puck and I to have a stroke.

At least we wouldn't be arguing with each other anymore at that point. :D

I'd find something else to argue with you about

Puck 04-20-2017 11:04 PM

From press conference

Kevin Bowen‏ @KBowenColts

Ballard making it clear that “best player available” is the philosophy. Has been part of teams that took need over BPA before. Was a mistake
12:05 PM · Apr 19, 2017

Spike 04-20-2017 11:15 PM

Draft Lamp and then we are not fucking around with a first round bust. Shit, this is not rocket science.

VeveJones007 04-20-2017 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spike (Post 10223)
Draft Lamp and then we are not fucking around with a first round bust. Shit, this is not rocket science.

Pure hypothetical here, which do you choose at 1.15?

1) 22 year old Robert Mathis
2) 22 year old Jeff Saturday

natagu23 04-20-2017 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10224)
Pure hypothetical here, which do you choose at 1.15?

1) 22 year old Robert Mathis
2) 22 year old Jeff Saturday

We know that there is a guy that plays like Jeff Saturday right now.

You're just hoping that there is a guy that will play like Robert Mathis at 1.15. Im sorry, there is no one that looks remotely close to mathis at 15.

VeveJones007 04-20-2017 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natagu23 (Post 10225)
We know that there is a guy that plays like Jeff Saturday right now.

You're just hoping that there is a guy that will play like Robert Mathis at 1.15. Im sorry, there is no one that looks remotely close to mathis at 15.

What if Ballard thinks there is? It's a simple floor/ceiling argument. Frankly, a Saturday stabilizes the OL, but doesn't really move the needle on proximity to a title. After all those years with PM, I don't care about AFC South banners. Swing for the fences and assemble a champion.

Spike 04-21-2017 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10224)
Pure hypothetical here, which do you choose at 1.15?

1) 22 year old Robert Mathis
2) 22 year old Jeff Saturday

Mathis, but I am not sure you get a Mathis at 15 in this years draft. Therefore I am of the opinion that you protect Luck with the safest pick in the draft with Lamp.

natagu23 04-21-2017 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10226)
What if Ballard thinks there is? It's a simple floor/ceiling argument. Frankly, a Saturday stabilizes the OL, but doesn't really move the needle on proximity to a title. After all those years with PM, I don't care about AFC South banners. Swing for the fences and assemble a champion.

I'll give you that its virtually impossible to know if guys like Harris, Taco Charlton, Carl Lawson, Tim Williams or Takk could develop into solid pass rushers.

The point that im trying to make is that all those guys are late 1st to 2nd round picks. We're talking about a huge reach to grab one of those guys.

Again, we don't know where Ballard and his team has those guys....true. But there seems to be a consensus that after Solomon Thomas and Garrett the pass-rushing talent falls off a f**king cliff where Derek Barnett is somewhere in-between the cream of the crop and the 2nd tier.

The only defensive non-cornerback I would be ok drafting at 1.15 is Riddick and Foster. Foster is very concerning now because we all know the league hands out drug related suspensions like candy.

I've narrowed it down to...

1. Riddick
2. Foster
3. Ryan Ramczyk/Lamp
4. Marlon Humphrey
5. Conley

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natagu23 (Post 10231)
I'll give you that its virtually impossible to know if guys like Harris, Taco Charlton, Carl Lawson, Tim Williams or Takk could develop into solid pass rushers.

The point that im trying to make is that all those guys are late 1st to 2nd round picks. We're talking about a huge reach to grab one of those guys.

Again, we don't know where Ballard and his team has those guys....true. But there seems to be a consensus that after Solomon Thomas and Garrett the pass-rushing talent falls off a f**king cliff where Derek Barnett is somewhere in-between the cream of the crop and the 2nd tier.

The only defensive non-cornerback I would be ok drafting at 1.15 is Riddick and Foster. Foster is very concerning now because we all know the league hands out drug related suspensions like candy.

I've narrowed it down to...

1. Riddick
2. Foster
3. Ryan Ramczyk/Lamp
4. Marlon Humphrey
5. Conley

Do you really think Ram/Lamp are better than late 1st/early 2nd grades on those EDGE guys? I don't.

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 01:49 AM

BTW, I definitely take one of Foster, Riddick, Harris, or Takk before I take one of those OL. Absolutely should trade down unless Ballard is comfortable with Foster's interviews, though.

natagu23 04-21-2017 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10233)
Do you really think Ram/Lamp are better than late 1st/early 2nd grades on those EDGE guys? I don't.

Lamp?

AbsoFuckinglutely. Are you kidding me? You might be getting caught up in the dynamic play ability of edge rushers vs. olinemen.

This is a 4 year starter at WKU where most of starts were almost exclusively at LT. Again, you put on the LSU tape and the Alabama tape, no question.

He'll most likely play guard in the NFL, but he has LT tackle experience playing against some elite programs and performing well.

You literally can plug him in at any spot along the oline, and he's an after-thought.... in a good way. Plug him and forget him.

You replace his school name from WKU to Stanferdz, he'd be a legit top 10 pick.

natagu23 04-21-2017 03:29 AM

Imagine we pick up Lamp in the 1st and T.J. Watt in the 2nd?

Congratz, we just won the draft.

There are just more moves you can make in the 2nd than you can in the 1st.

natagu23 04-21-2017 03:35 AM

Stanzo-Mewtwo-Kelly-Lamp-Clark

That's a pretty decent oline on paper.

Most of your liability concerns would be with Clark and whether he makes the jump from his rookie season.

You can interchange the name Clark with Haeg...which ever you prefer.

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10174)
Ugh, Foster got hit with a diluted urine sample at the combine, so he's now in the system. Given his other character question marks and Ballard's comments on Wednesday, you have to think he'll be off their board at 15. I hope not, but I'm taking Ballard at his word that character is an important factor for him.

I wouldn't be so quick. Teams really love him and some see him as a Ray Lewis type. I was thinking he would go top 5. Now I don't see him getting out of the the 1st. Diluted sample means he just drank a lot of water, which a lot of players do before the combine to gain a little extra weight.

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10224)
Pure hypothetical here, which do you choose at 1.15?

1) 22 year old Robert Mathis
2) 22 year old Jeff Saturday

Pass rusher, always pass rusher.

You have to think about the impact on the game the player will have and the best athletes go in the first.

Spike 04-21-2017 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10234)
BTW, I definitely take one of Foster, Riddick, Harris, or Takk before I take one of those OL. Absolutely should trade down unless Ballard is comfortable with Foster's interviews, though.

I guess I am just sick & tired of watching Luck get the shit knocked out of him. Our franchise QB is in a sling right now, don't you think protecting him is our most pressing need right now?

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10234)
BTW, I definitely take one of Foster, Riddick, Harris, or Takk before I take one of those OL. Absolutely should trade down unless Ballard is comfortable with Foster's interviews, though.

There is a lot of pass rushing talent but there are also some minefields in there. I take Foster first over Reddick. Reddick will be transitioning to a new position who knows how that will go. If it goes well, expect him to be a Swiss Army knife on defense in a few years. By that time Foster will likely be a pro bowler.

Next I go Harris, he would have had better numbers if not for a scheme change. But guys that I really like and are late risers are Rivers of Youngstown, I feel this guy is what Tim Williams should be. And Bowser of Houston, there is a small sample size b/c they kept dropping him to cover but he looks like he has tons of potential. Imagine a larger Reddick and that is Bowser. Maybe one of them is available in the 2nd.

Stay away from Barnett. Takk only if you go in knowing he needs technique work, but the athletism is there. Well besides Garrett, they will all need some technique work.

natagu23 04-21-2017 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 10257)
There is a lot of pass rushing talent but there are also some minefields in there. I take Foster first over Reddick. Reddick will be transitioning to a new position who knows how that will go. If it goes well, expect him to be a Swiss Army knife on defense in a few years. By that time Foster will likely be a pro bowler.

Next I go Harris, he would have had better numbers if not for a scheme change. But guys that I really like and are late risers are Rivers of Youngstown, I feel this guy is what Tim Williams should be. And Bowser of Houston, there is a small sample size b/c they kept dropping him to cover but he looks like he has tons of potential. Imagine a larger Reddick and that is Bowser. Maybe one of them is available in the 2nd.

Stay away from Barnett. Takk only if you go in knowing he needs technique work, but the athletism is there. Well besides Garrett, they will all need some technique work.


Barnett has to be a no no.

Wyatt 04-21-2017 09:47 AM

Fournette scored an 11 on the Wonderlick Test FWIW

Florida State RB Dalvin Cook also scored an 11, and Oklahoma’s Joe Mixon scored a 12. Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey recorded a 21, while Tennessee RB Alvin Kamara scored a 24.

Not that any of this matters, but for the sake of discussion, average RB score is around 16.

Andrew Luck - 37
Peyton Manning - 28
Ezekiel Elliot - 32
Frank Gore - 6
Reggie Wayne - 13

Wyatt 04-21-2017 09:52 AM

Interesting Article on Reddick by Bleacher Report

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...fl-draft-class

Coltsalr 04-21-2017 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natagu23 (Post 10231)
I'll give you that its virtually impossible to know if guys like Harris, Taco Charlton, Carl Lawson, Tim Williams or Takk could develop into solid pass rushers.

The point that im trying to make is that all those guys are late 1st to 2nd round picks. We're talking about a huge reach to grab one of those guys.

Again, we don't know where Ballard and his team has those guys....true. But there seems to be a consensus that after Solomon Thomas and Garrett the pass-rushing talent falls off a f**king cliff where Derek Barnett is somewhere in-between the cream of the crop and the 2nd tier.

The only defensive non-cornerback I would be ok drafting at 1.15 is Riddick and Foster. Foster is very concerning now because we all know the league hands out drug related suspensions like candy.

I've narrowed it down to...

1. Riddick
2. Foster
3. Ryan Ramczyk/Lamp
4. Marlon Humphrey
5. Conley

As a Florida guy, do you have any take on Jarrad Davis? He also strikes me as a guy that would be a safe 1st round pick, albeit that he might be a bit of a reach at #15 (though perhaps maybe not, as there's some recent rumblings that he could go ahead of Reuben Foster in the top 15).

Coltsalr 04-21-2017 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spike (Post 10256)
I guess I am just sick & tired of watching Luck get the shit knocked out of him. Our franchise QB is in a sling right now, don't you think protecting him is our most pressing need right now?

Agreed, though I think there was a fair bit less shit-kicking by the end of last season. That group seemed to gel a bit, and while it would be nice if the Colts decided they needed to have the Great Wall of China for an OL (ala the Dallas Cowboys), I do wonder if that's our shrewdest investment, as I don't think the need is as dire there.

Like I said, I won't bitch if they go with Forrest Lamp. I would however worry about our other needs, moreso than I would worry if OL isn't addressed until Day 3.

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natagu23 (Post 10263)
Barnett has be a no no.

Whats that?

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wyatt (Post 10265)
Interesting Article on Reddick by Bleacher Report

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...fl-draft-class

That's the thing, he has the athleticism to play the position although he is a little undersized for my taste. The question is how he can adjust to the responsibilities of the MIKE. There will be an adjustment period, he won't rush out of the gate right away, they will ease him in slowly. What that article doesn't mention is what a LB actually does. Can he make all the reads at the pro level, how fast can he do it? Also the MIKE is often the leader of the D and sets the tone, gets people in the right place, etc. This is why I like Foster better, he has done it, he knows the position, has lead one of the best defenses ever, is extremely instinctive often blowing up plays before they can even get going. He will have a much greater head start on Reddick. Reddick in a few years may be more versatile and scary, but for right now he has to learn a new position. I think he would excel in a system like Seattle.

Reddick might be the pick, and it's possible that Bostic is to be a stop gap till Reddick gets going.

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wyatt (Post 10264)
Fournette scored an 11 on the Wonderlick Test FWIW

Florida State RB Dalvin Cook also scored an 11, and Oklahoma’s Joe Mixon scored a 12. Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey recorded a 21, while Tennessee RB Alvin Kamara scored a 24.

Not that any of this matters, but for the sake of discussion, average RB score is around 16.

Andrew Luck - 37
Peyton Manning - 28
Ezekiel Elliot - 32
Frank Gore - 6
Reggie Wayne - 13

hahaha yeah I don't see that as very important in skill positions except QB.

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 10273)
That's the thing, he has the athleticism to play the position although he is a little undersized for my taste. The question is how he can adjust to the responsibilities of the MIKE. There will be an adjustment period, he won't rush out of the gate right away, they will ease him in slowly. What that article doesn't mention is what a LB actually does. Can he make all the reads at the pro level, how fast can he do it? Also the MIKE is often the leader of the D and sets the tone, gets people in the right place, etc. This is why I like Foster better, he has done it, he knows the position, has lead one of the best defenses ever, is extremely instinctive often blowing up plays before they can even get going. He will have a much greater head start on Reddick. Reddick in a few years may be more versatile and scary, but for right now he has to learn a new position. I think he would excel in a system like Seattle.

Reddick might be the pick, and it's possible that Bostic is to be a stop gap till Reddick gets going.

I still think Reddick ends up at EDGE most of the time. He's too good of a pass rusher to waste inside.

YDFL Commish 04-21-2017 11:42 AM

Ok, we have all talked about our desire to trade down and pick up additional picks. Which I'm all for BTW!

But how many would be in favor of trading up to get the once in a lifetime talent of Myles Garrett?

What would it take to do so? At least this years 1st and next years 1st at a minimum, I would expect. But how much more?

How many would be in favor of such a move?

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 10284)
Ok, we have all talked about our desire to trade down and pick up additional picks. Which I'm all for BTW!

But how many would be in favor of trading up to get the once in a lifetime talent of Myles Garrett?

What would it take to do so? At least this years 1st and next years 1st at a minimum, I would expect. But how much more?

How many would be in favor of such a move?

Check the value chart

http://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php

It would take most of our draft this year and our 1st and 2nd next year likely. That is pretty steep. There is a lot of defensive talent in this draft. If we could figure out somehow to get another 2nd and 3rd this draft or even two more 3rds, we could completely rebuild the D in one draft.

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 10283)
I still think Reddick ends up at EDGE most of the time. He's too good of a pass rusher to waste inside.

The way I kind of picture him is inside for two downs and outside for passing downs. But he would give you the option of blitzing him from virtually anywhere. But him out there with a dedicated EDGE and then you really start causing problems. Will he cover the TE or RB and do it very well? Or is he coming on a blitz? But as a dedicated EDGE, I don't know. He has great bend, but he will have problems with long armed tackles, he is just so short for that position. I would rather combine him with a Harris, Rivers, Watt, or Bowser. That could be a deadly combo.

Also, Foster is an excellent blitzer from between the tackles.

I do think Reddick is smart and has great character and that will play a role. Ballard is reading about the Cubs build by Epstein and this quote seemed to have an impact on Ballard.

"Theo -- baseball was getting flat in terms of the analytics and the edge that they were getting from the numbers -- so he kind of took a different approach with character," Ballard said, via ESPN's Mike Wells. "We want high-character guys that love football, that will hold each other accountable, that will be good teammates. It stuck out like a beacon light.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...n-cubs-example

Wyatt 04-21-2017 12:12 PM

@ShouldntBragBut 6m6 minutes ago
Colts continue to show DB Obi Melifonwu, UConn steady levels of interest

Butter 04-21-2017 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 10251)
I wouldn't be so quick. Teams really love him and some see him as a Ray Lewis type.

Do they figure he will be involved in a murder?

Butter 04-21-2017 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 10272)
Whats that?

https://img.memesuper.com/ad49dbdf36...e_470-352.jpeg

Chromeburn 04-21-2017 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butter (Post 10296)
Do they figure he will be involved in a murder?

One can only hope!

sherck 04-21-2017 12:59 PM

Quote:

If we could figure out somehow to get another 2nd and 3rd this draft or even two more 3rds, we could completely rebuild the D in one draft.
Trade from 1-15 to 1-19 and then from 1-19 to about 1-24 or 1-25 nets you 2 3rd round choices with trading nothing away.

Cheers,

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Wyatt 04-21-2017 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 10251)
I wouldn't be so quick. Teams really love him and some see him as a Ray Lewis type. I was thinking he would go top 5. Now I don't see him getting out of the the 1st. Diluted sample means he just drank a lot of water, which a lot of players do before the combine to gain a little extra weight.

I'll take the Ray Lewis type as in murdering the opponent on the field, off the field perhaps not as much lol

VeveJones007 04-21-2017 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 10284)
Ok, we have all talked about our desire to trade down and pick up additional picks. Which I'm all for BTW!

But how many would be in favor of trading up to get the once in a lifetime talent of Myles Garrett?

What would it take to do so? At least this years 1st and next years 1st at a minimum, I would expect. But how much more?

How many would be in favor of such a move?

0%. It would cost way too much and there are so many needs across the roster.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.