ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   New Starting QB Brissett: Perhaps a Legacy of His Own (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=79854)

JAFF 11-22-2019 05:50 PM

Brissett has benefited from a great run game. And last night showed how important Mack is to this team.

What Brissett hasn't had for the last 4 games is an honest to god #1 reciever. TY wasn't TY. The only guy he can count on is Jack Doyle. Its hard to judge a QB when guys don't catch the ball or run a route deep enough to get a first down.

Brissett wasn't great last night, but he didn't get a lot of help. Drops, missed blocks, penalties, missed penalties and an inability to get to the opposing QB is what lost the game.

The Colts don't need a new QB. They need a ass kicking DE/DT that can get to the QB. They need two recievers that can stay healthy and make plays.

All of the above would cost less than a QB

Brylok 11-22-2019 06:07 PM

Jacoby can't throw the ball 20 yards down field. You could put Jerry Rice and Randy Moss opposite each other, it wouldn't matter much if the ball can't get to them.

Luck4Reich 11-22-2019 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brylok (Post 144436)
Jacoby can't throw the ball 20 yards down field. You could put Jerry Rice and Randy Moss opposite each other, it wouldn't matter much if the ball can't get to them.

This!

CanuckColt 11-23-2019 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 144424)
Brissett has benefited from a great run game. And last night showed how important Mack is to this team.

What Brissett hasn't had for the last 4 games is an honest to god #1 reciever. TY wasn't TY. The only guy he can count on is Jack Doyle. Its hard to judge a QB when guys don't catch the ball or run a route deep enough to get a first down.

Brissett wasn't great last night, but he didn't get a lot of help. Drops, missed blocks, penalties, missed penalties and an inability to get to the opposing QB is what lost the game.

The Colts don't need a new QB. They need a ass kicking DE/DT that can get to the QB. They need two recievers that can stay healthy and make plays.

All of the above would cost less than a QB

They DO need a new QB.

CanuckColt 11-23-2019 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brylok (Post 144436)
Jacoby can't throw the ball 20 yards down field. You could put Jerry Rice and Randy Moss opposite each other, it wouldn't matter much if the ball can't get to them.

Reich would make them run short crossing routes.

Brylok 11-25-2019 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanuckColt (Post 144504)
Reich would make them run short crossing routes.

Gotta fit Jacoby's skill set...

Dam8610 11-26-2019 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CanuckColt (Post 144504)
Reich would make them run short crossing routes.

Jerry Rice was known for taking short crossing routes to the house.

Oldcolt 11-26-2019 09:55 PM

We are not going to get another franchise quarterback. It took us years of being shit to land Peyton. We got a huge break to get our next one. We need to build a great defense and put guys around a decent qb. Not sure if that qb is Brissett but not sure it isn't. Which guy is the real player, the first game against Houston or the second game? Hell if I know.

Colts And Orioles 11-26-2019 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 144969)


We are not going to get another franchise quarterback. It took us years of being shit to land Peyton. We got a huge break to get our next one. We need to build a great defense and put guys around a decent qb. Not sure if that qb is Brissett but not sure it isn't. Which guy is the real player, the first game against Houston or the second game? Hell if I know.


o


The Colts had one shit year which landed them Peyton Manning ........ the 3-13 1997 season.

In 1996 the Colts went 9-7 and made the playoffs, in 1995 they went 9-7 and made the playoffs, and in 1994 they went 8-8.


http://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/te...istories/colts


The Colts had 5 or 6 shit years between 1984 and 1993, but they had nothing to do with their eventual landing of Manning.


o

Brylok 11-27-2019 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 144972)
o


The Colts had one shit year which landed them Peyton Manning ........ the 3-13 1997 season.

In 1996 the Colts went 9-7 and made the playoffs, in 1995 they went 9-7 and made the playoffs, and in 1994 they went 8-8.


http://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/te...istories/colts


The Colts had 5 or 6 shit years between 1984 and 1993, but they had nothing to do with their eventual landing of Manning.


o

Haha! Five or six shit years before Peyton Manning? Good lord! That's your Baltimore talking. Try eleven shit years to start. The Colts were awful! They were a national laughing stock. I grew up with it. My family were Bears fans because the Colts were a joke. Non competitive. Then, when I was in the Navy, they had the Harbaugh year. I was still a Bears fan and took some heat from the guys who knew I was from Indy. I remember "no trim til the Colts win" and people's dad's walking around looking like Grisley Adams. "Lord help our Colts" was a weekly staple. I remember one year when Subway offered a promotion on the last game of the season, that if the Colts beat the Jets, you can get a 6 inch sub for the price of the point difference. The Colts won by a field goal, and by the time I got to the Subway, they were out of bread. Three cent subs sell out fast. And after that, at least half of the damn fans wanted to draft Ryan Leaf.
I know you're old as hell and I have nothing against you or anything, but that post was asinine. Absolutely clueless about Colts life in Indianapolis before Peyton Manning.
Five or six shit years...jeezus


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.